Diagnose More Condition_symptoms Is Coronary CT Angiogram More Reliable Than Invasive Coronary Angiogram To Diagnose Heart Disease?

Is Coronary CT angiogram more reliable than invasive coronary angiogram to diagnose heart disease? - diagnose more condition_symptoms

It's a bit odd that the person who claimed a doctor a question seems quite different from what you are asked to respond to bathe, but I'll try and sort things out.

Loving_Heart answer in relation to diseases of the bile ducts and no coronary artery disease. It's difficult for someone that CT coronary angiography is "better" or "safer" than conventional coronary angiography, for coronary angiography studies have been published almost everywhere, with the traditional "standard - gold." The accuracy of coronary CT is normally exist with respect to coronary angiography.

The studies were published suggesting that 64-slice CT has a sensitivity of 93-100%, a specificity of 90-95% and the positive and negative predictive value of 75-85% or 95-100%, respectively, has for the detection of significant coronary stenosis. In other words, the CT angiography a very good and feels better. At this stage it is to say a little better that we do not heart disease than those who do notis and who is much less useful to humans, stents or bypass.